Kansoft's SAP services — S/4HANA implementation, ECC to S/4HANA migration, application managed services, ABAP / RAP / BTP custom development, SAP CPI integration and SAC / Datasphere analytics. Engineered around your operating reality.
Most engagements stitch two or three of these together — for example, ECC migration plus AMS, or implementation plus integration. We scope the combination at discovery, not by SKU.
Greenfield S/4HANA Cloud or On-Premise implementations, including RISE with SAP. Process design grounded in industry templates, configured to your operating model — not the other way around.
Brownfield, bluefield or selective migration from SAP ECC. Custom-code disposition, SAP Readiness Check, mock conversions and a cutover sequence that respects fiscal and shop-floor calendars.
Application Managed Services with a fixed squad shape, published cadence and SLA-backed incident response. Onboarded during hypercare so there's no knowledge cliff between build and run.
Classical ABAP where it's right, RESTful ABAP (RAP) where it's becoming right, BTP side-by-side extensions where the digital core needs to stay clean. The choice is conscious, not historical.
SAP Integration Suite for SAP-aware flows; iPaaS / event-bus layers (Azure Event Grid, Kafka, MuleSoft) for non-SAP-aware ones. Every integration owned by an OpenAPI / async-API contract.
SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Datasphere and BW/4HANA reporting — wired into your data fabric, not parked next to it. Drill-through from boardroom dashboard to source-of-record transactions.
Honest scope: the technologies the engagement actually touches. Not every engagement uses every one — and we'll tell you which ones are out of scope before you ask.
Kansoft has delivered engineering programmes — data platforms, modernisation, IoT, BI — for these industries. Our SAP practice extends that reach to the digital core, not from a standing start.
Process industries (cement, chemicals), discrete manufacturing, EAM and Plant Maintenance. We bring real-world IoT and plant-floor integration depth from Wonder Cement and similar engagements.
Renewable infrastructure portfolios, transmission, utilities. Portfolio analytics, BI and integration patterns from Sterlite Power-class engagements carry directly into SAP-side reporting.
Distributed manufacturing footprints with HR, IT and policy estates spanning multiple sites — informed by our Finolex intranet and enterprise-portal work.
EWM, TM, multi-site warehouse and dispatch. Vehicle sequencing, weighbridge integration and shop-floor IoT carry over from our in-plant logistics work.
Most SAP discovery exercises return a 90-slide deck. Ours returns a 6-page brief: deployment-model recommendation, custom-code disposition, integration map, and a phased cutover that respects your fiscal and operating calendar.
Current-state SAP estate map, SAP Readiness Check, custom-code complexity scan, integration topology, and a deployment-model recommendation (RISE Cloud / Private / On-Prem) with the trade-offs written out.
Target S/4HANA architecture, BTP extension strategy, integration blueprint (CPI / API Management / Event Mesh), data archive plan and a phased cutover sequence sized to your operating cadence.
Phased delivery — mock conversions, dry-run cutovers, custom-code refactor / replatform, BTP side-by-side build, integration testing under load, hypercare run by the team that built it.
Application managed services with published SLAs, monthly release cadence, FinOps for SAP cloud workloads, BTP enhancement pipeline and continuous integration improvements.
A 30-minute discovery call returns the deployment-model recommendation, custom-code disposition view, and a scoped timeline — before you commit to anything.
Book a 30-min SAP Discovery CallWe're building Kansoft's SAP practice on the engineering capability we already deliver — cloud, integration, data and modernisation. That gives an SAP engagement here a different shape than at a pure SAP consultancy.
Our SAP scope is owned by people who deliver code in production every week — not consultants who hand off to a build partner. Implementation, integration and modernisation tracks sit with us from architecture through hypercare.
Years of integrating SAP-class systems with cloud, BI, IoT and ML platforms (Sterlite Power, Wonder Cement, Finolex). When the SAP side meets non-SAP, the boundary is engineered, not improvised.
Real engagement depth across manufacturing, energy, cable & pipe and logistics — the industries SAP transformations actually land in. The conversation starts at your operating model, not at SAP's.
We're explicit about what sits with our team versus a partner consultancy on functional SAP. No ambiguity baked into the engagement, no surprise hand-offs after kickoff.
It depends on three things: data residency constraints, the depth of existing customisations you want to retain, and whether you want SAP to operate the platform or your own team. RISE with SAP is the lowest-friction path when the operating model fits and the workload is broadly standard. On-premise S/4HANA still wins when you have heavy custom code, regulated data residency rules, or specific integration topologies that don't map cleanly to a hyperscaler tenant. We run a one-week deployment-model assessment that produces a recommendation with the trade-offs explicit, not buried.
Brownfield (in-place conversion) is faster and preserves history, but inherits your customisation debt. Greenfield (re-implementation) is cleanest and lets you redesign processes, but it's a longer programme and the change-management bill is bigger. Bluefield (selective data migration) sits in between and is increasingly the right answer for mid-sized estates. We score your estate against the three paths using SAP Readiness Check output plus our own custom-code complexity scan, and recommend the path that minimises total cost of disruption — not just licence cost.
We inventory it first. SAP Readiness Check flags the non-compatible code; our scan extends that with cyclomatic-complexity and dead-code analysis. Customisations split into four buckets: drop (genuinely unused), retain (clean and still strategic), refactor (will run but should be modernised to RAP / CDS), and replatform (move to BTP side-by-side extensions so the digital core stays clean). The output is a custom-code disposition list your team can review line by line — not a black-box migration.
Yes. Our SAP AMS model wraps L2 / L3 support, enhancement delivery, monthly release cadence and SLA-backed incident response into a single managed engagement. The squad shape is fixed (functional + ABAP + Basis cover), the cadence is published, and the SLA targets are written into the SOW. We onboard during your hypercare phase so the transition from implementation to AMS doesn't introduce a knowledge cliff.
SAP Integration Suite (CPI / API Management / Event Mesh) for SAP-aware flows, with iFlow templates we re-use across engagements. For non-SAP-aware integrations — data warehouse loads, ML model feeds, BI handoffs — we add an iPaaS or event-bus layer (Azure Event Grid, Kafka, MuleSoft) depending on the existing estate. The principle is the same on both sides: integrations are owned by a contract (OpenAPI / async-API spec), not by tribal knowledge.
BTP is the right answer when the extension must stay close to S/4HANA data and identity, when you need SAP-managed runtime, or when the build is a Fiori app that benefits from BTP's reusable services. Side-by-side custom apps (typically on Azure or AWS) win when the extension is mostly non-SAP — heavy data engineering, ML, or consumer-facing UX — and the integration to S/4HANA is event-driven rather than transactional. We typically end up with a mix, with the BTP / non-BTP boundary chosen consciously rather than by default.
We're actively building our SAP practice. Today we bring deep engineering capability — cloud, integration, data and modernisation — proven on enterprise engagements (Sterlite Power, Wonder Cement, Finolex). For SAP-specific delivery we work with certified SAP consultants on the functional side and own the technical, integration, analytics and modernisation tracks ourselves. We'll be transparent about which scope sits with us versus a partner consultancy at the SOW stage.
